Sep 14, 2020
Okay, here we go, friends. This is a MUST READ before the election.
A group called the Transition Integrity Project recently released a document that predicted extreme violence after the election unless Joe Biden was elected with a definitive win in both the electoral college and in the popular vote.
Let me tell you about the people behind the report. They call themselves a "bipartisan" group, but the only "Republicans" who participated in this exercise are those who hate Trump. So, although technically, the word "bipartisan" might fit, the group was extremely biased against Trump, and that's obvious if you read their report.
So, what did these Trump-haters do? They played a game. A role playing game. Part of them took on the role of "Team Trump," others took on "Team Biden," and others played other roles during the game. They focused on four possible scenarios.
The first scenario was an ambiguous result on election night, or so they claim. But if you read what the proposed, it was that Trump would win that day but then there would be a "blue shift" from mail-in ballots (i.e., mail-in ballots for Biden would magically appear and none of them would be for Trump). Violence would ensue and Trump would deploy the military to stop the unrest. Of course, they saw this as a negative and they claimed the violence would come from the Right, even though there's no evidence that might happen, especially since all the violence we've been seeing lately has been from the Left.
The second scenario was where Biden clearly won both the electoral college. This was the only scenario where the Trump-hating players felt there would be no violence. Logically speaking, this indicates that it's obvious the violence, if there is any, would come from the Left. The only time violence occurred in their game was if there was a chance Biden might lose. So, it appears they revealed their plan to stop Trump's election by any means possible.
The third scenario was labeled, "A clear Trump win." However, if you read on, you see it says that in this Trump-hating scenario, he only won the electoral college and Biden won the popular vote. There was no scenario where there was a decisive Trump win in both the electoral college AND the popular vote. In fact, throughout the report, it is clear they hate the electoral college and want to do away with it so us pesky voters in fly-over country can't stop them from getting their way to turn our country into a communist nation.
The Biden campaign would, of course, ask Democrat governors in key states to demand a recount and try to push the country into a Constitutional crisis. This organization saw that as a good thing.
The final scenario was a narrow Biden win (see what I mean about no scenario for a decisive Trump win in both the electoral college and the popular vote?). This one got brutal, involving even Mitch McConnell and other Republicans turning on Trump, Barr stopping the counting of ballots, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff leaking internal memos to try to sway the results.
Now, remember, every single person who participated in this game was a Trump-hater. One of the organizers, Rosa Brooks, is buddy-buddy with George Soros. I'm not totally sure how to categorize the document. Either it's laying out their dream of the only way they could defeat Trump, or it's a confession to illegal tactics they've used in past elections or are planning on using in this election. Every action the Trump team took was not at all in the character of Trump or his team, and relied heavily on deception and illegality. All the Biden team were so virtuous they had halos.
So, why bother with a document such as this? Because I believe these are the marching orders for their minions for after the election. This is their call to action to tell their followers how to cause the most chaos no matter how the election turns out (well, again, except for an overwhelming Trump win in the popular vote and the electoral college). In other words, their plan is to cause massive violence to give them enough time to forge a sufficient amount of ballots to give Biden a win. If Biden doesn't win, they won't concede the election. Ever.
Now, combine those tactics with a group called Defeat Disinfo, which is using DARPA artificial intelligence to silence anyone who supports Trump on social media (the head guy says it's because he doesn't like people supporting Trump, is that a reason to silence anyone with Conservative views???). When we make statements of fact backed up with real evidence, they'll claim it's disinfo and tag or remove our posts. Even now, I've posted things before that were factual and documented and they claimed they weren't. There's no appeal, no way to get that removed from a post. And their "fact checkers" are Trump-haters as well.
Imagine if in the next few weeks that all posts (or even the majority of posts) that support Trump and use factual evidence were suddenly censored in this way. They've already done it to so many. What if all the pro-Trump groups suddenly find their groups removed? What if pro-Trump personalities with millions of followers suddenly find their posts won't show to anyone? It's already happening.
On Twitter just today I discovered Twitter's analytics says I haven't sent a single tweet this month, even though it shows those non-existent posts have garnered 20.3K impressions. How's that work?
Make no mistake. This isn't about truth. It's all about a narrative. A story. What they believe people want to hear (itching ears). Those on the Left believe if they repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. Don't fall for the lies. Do your own research. Check the facts for yourself. Don't just listen to short sound bites, but listen to them in context. I don't know how may people repeat the Left's lies about Trump because all they've heard is a carefully selected and edited sound bite that suits the Left's narrative. Anyone can make anyone else say whatever they want if they've got an adept editor. Like the Bible says, Judas went and hanged himself. Go and do thou likewise. Obviously, the Bible does indeed say these two things, but never together and you have to take them way out of context to do something like this. Context is vital. If you hear a clip of President Trump and it sounds awful, rest assured you are listening to a clip that's been manipulated to sound differently than it was in the real context.
With all this said, here's the document itself so you can read it on your own. Just remember this was a game they played and all the players hate Trump. When you understand that, you see this as their Trump Derangement Syndrome showing as it permeates all their decisions throughout the game.
Before 8chan went down, I saw posts about the timestamp on the manifesto of the El Paso shooter being AFTER the shooting. Of course, I was too busy at the time to download the info so I could study it. Rats!
But today I was given the link to this video by the OWNER of 8chan that confirmed the manifesto post on 8chan was NOT by the original poster. It was done for research purposes by an Anon, and that's why the timestamp was AFTER the time of the shooting. The shooter posted the original on INSTAGRAM.
So, this whole thing about Cloudflare booting 8chan is VERY bogus! 8chan did nothing wrong!
Here's 8chan's owner to tell you about it. (You might want to set the speed to 1.25 or 1.5. He speaks very slowly!)
Aug 5, 2019
According to Ron @CodeMonkeyZ, they switched to a new company, but then that company also dropped 8chan. I'm sorry but I forget what it was called. Not sure what the status is now, but at 5 pm eastern, it's still down for me.
Here's an interesting video that did a bit of a dig on Cloudflare. My only comment is the YouTuber said Q was inadvertently caught up in this attack on 8chan. I don't believe that to be true. I think Q was the target!
Update at 5:15
Here are Ron's tweets from this afternoon.
Here are Ron's tweets from this afternoon. Seems the Bitmitigate was deplatformed for hosting 8chan. Hopefully they'll get it worked out soon.
Aug 5, 2019
Make no mistake, folks. We're in a real battle for the minds of people. No, it's not the type of battle where bullets zing overhead, but the fighting is real.
After the El Paso Walmart shooting, now the 8chan site is under attack.
There's a concerted effort to link 8chan to hate crimes.
For those who don't know, 8chan is a site that allows true free speech without moderation, and this is offensive to many people because sometimes individuals say stupid things. It's just a part of the human condition.
Yet this freedom is why Q chose this site to post his messages to us on.
Now the media is claiming that because the El Paso Walmart shooter posted a manifesto on there prior to his rampage (although, the time stamp would appear it was posted later), all of 8chan should be shunned because of the actions of one person. This is just one more example of the many being punished for the sins of one.
After pressure from the mainstream media, Cloudflare has succumbed to this mentality and decided to end their business relationship with 8chan. At the time I'm writing this, 8chan is down, but I'm confident it won't stay that way for long.
In Cloudflare's blog post on this move, they hate on 8chan all the while they are denouncing 8chan for hatred. Anyone else see the irony in this?
Cloudflare claims this is all done because they support the "Rule of Law." Another irony. Their definition of this term shows a woeful ignorance of what it means: to apply the same standard to all so everyone is treated equally under the law.
How is singling out 8chan for special treatment fulfilling the "Rule of Law"? It isn't.
Not everyone is fooled, though. The comments prove some are awake to what's really going on. This isn't about any real concern for law, but it's really about silencing those who disagree with the "official" narrative.
"In this blog post, Cloudflare even admits that this decision was not about whether 8ch violated the law. They've denied service to 8ch, simply because they believe 8ch has 'created an environment that revels in violating [the law's] spirit.'"
In other words, 8chan allows users to say things they don't like.
As with guns, if someone is set on committing an act of terror, laws won't keep them from doing it. If someone wants to post a hateful manifesto (sorry, I haven't read it yet, so I apologize if I'm not characterizing it correctly), they'll find a way to do it. Laws only restrain law-abiding people--not crazies.
And then there's the cry that there's no moderation on 8chan...but yet, the shooter's post ws removed in under 10 minutes. Does anyone remember the Christchurch livestream that remained active for 45 minutes before Facebook took it down? Oh, such an inconvenient truth, huh? The calls to vilify 8chan are exposed again.
So, will this work? Will Cloudflare's decision to cut ties with 8chan spell the end of 8chan and one of the last bastions of free speech on the Internet?
Pepe's Ghost and I agree.
We'll find a way. Somehow.
FREE SPEECH CANNOT DIE!!!
Aug 4, 2019
YouTube has a rule that prevents me from even suggesting that an event might not have been genuine. While that urks me to no end (I got a strike on one video and they removed it), I'm going to play along and use my blog here to express my views on topics that aren't approved by YouTube.
I saw this post on the 8chan board and thought it needed to be brought to people's attention. I'd love to do a video on this, but I don't have my Bitchute account up and running yet. Anyway, here's the post. Please note: there is some bad language. But hey, it's 8chan, right?
WALMART SHOOTING QUESTIONS NO ONE IS ASKING:
1. How many cameras are in a Wal Mart? Why, if this shooting lasted for 20 minutes, is there not at least 10 consecutive hours of shooting video from 30 cameras? There's more than 30 in a Wal Mart, but let's guess 30 caught it REAL GOOD. Where is that video?
2. How in the * did this shooting continue for 20 minutes? How long does it take for people to bail from a Wal Mart? What would be the reaction of people hearing gunshots in a Wal Mart? My guess is that all opportunities to nail people would be totally over in 1:30 yet it continues for TWENTY DAMN MINUTES. Not believable.
3. Let's say this shooting really DID continue for 20 minutes - WHY THEN, did this shooter not get a can of cream of mushroom soup in his left ear at 57MPH from weak throw willie? I'd have probably delivered one at about 81 MPH. SHOOTING OVER. Ha, they claim Wal Mart had no guns on site, so the shooting continued and continued and continued . . . . when the store was full of places to hide from the shooter and throw something back at him, like, you know, perhaps a cordless drill? A can of spray paint? How about a small exercise weight?
No, that did not happen, instead, everyone went back to the toilet paper aisle rather than run out the door and waited THERE, in the paper aisle because there was enough paper towel and nearby cat litter in that section to clean up the BIGGEST blood spill. They knew someone needed a story, and were polite about getting it done.
20 minutes? People were there for 20 DAMN MINUTES? Yeah right, this story is STUPID folks.
I have successfully, in a hurry with Claudia waiting, parked over 100 feet from the door, gone in, got something, hit express checkout and got back to the car in under 3 minutes. That's quick for a Wal Mart, but it is possible, and an ENTIRE SHOPPING PROCESS. I PROMISE, IF THIS SHOOTING WAS REAL, THAT NO ONE WOULD HAVE HIT EVEN THE EXPRESS CHECKOUT. The store should have been empty in absolutely NO MORE than 1:30, thus leaving the shooter with no one to hit.
SHOOTING IN AISLE 5. REPEAT: SHOOTING IN AISLE 5. Ha, that's great, I am in aisle 43, I'll get those Ramen noodles . . . . . and you can't say the shooter had them cornered, there are two widely spaced exits plus emergency exits in a Wal Mart.
4. So he killed 20 and injured that many more. By himself. That's a lot of bullets for a 30 round clip. IS THAT WHY WE GET NO WAL MART VIDEO? BECAUSE THERE'S NO MAGAZINE CHANGES? Look folks, THEY GOT THE REQUIRED EVENTS FOR THIS SHOOTING TO BE REAL, ON VIDEO, IT'S A WAL MART. Let's see video of a magazine swap! If we don't have that the day after, well, that can be deep faked now, it DID NOT HAPPEN, that's a PRIME moment they would have released already.
5. Why, in ALL the CNN videos (and I watched quite a few) is there only ONE ambulance and ONE stretcher showing up? Hell, they had at least 40 people needing ambulances. Where was the overwhelming paramedic support? I have seen a few tards post that "if they are dead, they don't move them". That is true, IF and ONLY IF the body is so dead it has riga. All these were fresh. They should have all been pronounced dead at the hospital. Why ONLY ONE DAMN AMBULANCE?
You can see in the videos the BORDER PATROL, FBI, and regular cops were there, plus ONE fire truck and ONE ambulance. That's a repeat we see at these shootings- totally underwhelming EMT support. And I'll tell you why: EMT's are GOOD PEOPLE, and they could not get 165 of them who were corrupt pieces of shit to front this lie. But they could find five. (including driver). The FBI and border patrol would be EASY to pull enough dirt bags from, but the local police presence was weak too.
I could go on and on with this but I have probably said enough. BOTTOM LINE: They can't do one of these false flags, because they have SJW'ed unqualified people onto the scenario planning teams. Harpreet, who was in the Indian military, said you can't get that high a casualty count with people trying to avoid you in a short time, so the shooting had to be a long one, and Polly gave the go ahead for it to be TWENTY DAMN MINUTES LONG without considering the fact that the place had doors. That's an EMERGENCY GAFFE, and I mean, an F-5 cow throwing gaffe, a product of sheer stupidity and poor planning. That alone kills the story, on the outside edge I might believe 3-5 minutes because Aunt Edna had the electric cart and got lost in the clothing section on the way out . . . . and then only she would have been dead, the casualty count would not have been that high with so many places to hide, in Wal Mart you would never get a clear shot at ANYONE who was not handicapped after the first few seconds.
These are great questions that need to be addressed. I'm not saying this is a complete hoax, but these questions raise that possibility. Or possibly it's a hybrid. We won't know until more of this unfolds.