May 27, 2019
I'm someone who enjoys putting together a puzzle from time to time, and this entire situation playing out in our government right now reminds me of working a large, intricate puzzle that failed to include a picture of what the finished product is supposed to look like.
When I start a puzzle, most of the pieces have no meaning to me because I don't understand how they'll fit into the final picture. But then I do the frame and sort out pieces according to similar colors, and slowly but surely the picture starts to make more sense. At that point, I can pick up new pieces and give them general locations and, eventually, fit them into the puzzle to complete the full picture.
Q's posts are like this. Over the past year and a half, we read his posts and, while we understood some of what he said, much of his meaning eluded us. The Autists have helped us put together many of the pieces, but there are many more left to go. As we look back now, though, we can start to see things that we missed before because we now have a much better idea of the complete picture.
In this article, Is POTUS Using the UCMJ and MCM to Drain the Swamp?, the Anon (Ami Tiel) shows how these two documents may hold more information than we've originally understood. The day the revisions of the MCM (Manual for Courts-Martial) were posted to the Federal Register was the same day Tillerson was fired and Q posted that we should trust Sessions and gave us a BOOM!
I think you'll enjoy the read!
May 7, 2019
Did you ever think censorship would become this much of an issue in America? Did it ever even enter into your mind a couple of years ago?
Yet here we are in 2019. This quote is from Jack Posobiec's Periscope video after the @AOCPress parody account, run by a personal friend of his, was permanently suspended from Twitter May 6. It's happening to Conservatives in numbers it's hard to believe. The censorship is real and it could be coming for you next.
I'm a Conservative YouTube content creator and it's been hitting me hard lately. My channel took off with my 24th video on August 24, 2018 and zoomed from 100 subscribers to more than 25,000 in less than a month. I was surprised and quite humbled by the growth. Although there were ebbs and flows, which is normal for any channel (some videos take off better than others), I had a fairly steady growth--until March 17, 2019.
Suddenly, eight or nine out of ten of the videos I uploaded were deemed "unsuitable for most advertisers" from the moment they uploaded. While this certainly hit me in the wallet, there's more to it than that. From my observations of how many views I got on a video before (demonetized) and after YouTube did a manual review and monetized it, I noticed there was a significant change in how many non-subscriber views I got during those two periods of time.
In fact, I captured one episode on video using the realtime view feature in my creator studio. There was a significant difference between the before and after view count. This (and the replication of this with other videos) led me to conclude the algorithm YouTube uses to choose which videos to put in the suggested/recommended videos relied heavily on the monetization factor.
Certainly a part of me is concerned about the financial aspects of it (after all, I'm disabled and there are few jobs you can do where you can work for an hour or two and then lay down and rest for a couple of hours), the point of my YouTube channel is to provide information that people won't find in most news reports. But how can I provide this information if very few people see my videos?
If it were just me experiencing this phenomenon, I'd mark it up to a fluke. But it's not just me. Conservatives are being permanently suspended from Twitter in record numbers (I myself was shadowbanned for a long time), YouTube accounts that dare to mention Q are completely demonetized and some have been deleted, and Facebook has just done another Conservative purge.
So, what's the solution? Maybe it's time for us to restart our petitions for an Internet Bill of Rights and this time do it in earnest. We have to stop this bias in social media before the 2020 election in order to stop the election meddling these media giants did in the 2018 and 2016 election.
May 6, 2019
It's the current Democrat strategy to continue suing in Red states until the districts are changed enough to turn them blue.
Is there no end to their tricks? But then, what else do they have? They're losing on all sides now. There's no way they can stand up under Trump's economic success, and now that the Mueller Report is out, they've lost all hope of impeachment.
I think Scott Walker's opinion in this Fox opinion piece lays out the Democrat plan perfectly. We're going to see more lawsuits against redistricting until no more Red districts are left. Even if they fail to win the cases, it gives them more air time on the mainstream media to indoctrinate viewers.
For their part, Democrats are sitting back counting the cash they plan to use on their trial lawyers to fund their strategy of endless litigation. Win or lose they are happy to spend their money on lawyers just for the talking points their liberal judges and academics give them to use on cable news and social media. They are more interested in winning the battle of the courtroom in front of friendly judges than winning the battle of ideas before the voters.
Until we Republicans start using lawyers to fight back, this type of indoctrination will only continue.